Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cayenne-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cayenne-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B0B4DF0A4 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 23:57:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76285 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2013 23:57:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cayenne-dev-archive@cayenne.apache.org Received: (qmail 76232 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2013 23:57:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cayenne.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cayenne.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cayenne.apache.org Received: (qmail 76224 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2013 23:57:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 23:57:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [59.167.240.32] (HELO fish.ish.com.au) (59.167.240.32) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 23:57:51 +0000 Received: from ip-136.ish.com.au ([203.29.62.136]:56249) by fish.ish.com.au with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UwLIk-000536-2k for dev@cayenne.apache.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:57:03 +1000 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A150202.51DB51CF.0035,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 Message-ID: <51DB51CD.4070907@maniatis.org> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:57:01 +1000 From: Aristedes Maniatis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:23.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/23.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cayenne.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] 3.2M1 - take 2 References: <4E5B3223-DDF1-4449-8FA6-AD4DE099CCCE@objectstyle.org> In-Reply-To: <4E5B3223-DDF1-4449-8FA6-AD4DE099CCCE@objectstyle.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Did we change the javadoc build process to avoid the javadoc security flaw recently discovered? I patched the website javadocs, but I'm not sure if we also have to change something in our maven build process or upgrade some plugin. Ari On 8/07/13 3:31am, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > A new set of artifacts with no Rat failures is here: > > http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.2M1_2/ > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-112/ > > Please cast your votes. > > Andrus > -- --------------------------> Aristedes Maniatis GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A