cayenne-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrus Adamchik <>
Subject Re: cayenne logging
Date Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:34:29 GMT
In my own environment SLF is becoming more and more common. If that is the case with everyone
else, this would mean that using SLF would mean fewer hoops to jump for the majority of users.
So I wouldn't mind if we switch. But since there are ways to bridge from JCL to SLF, as well
as from SLF to JCL, theoretically both loggers should work the same everywhere. So maybe the
solution lies in documenting jcl-over-slf4j.jar bridge in our docs?


On Apr 23, 2013, at 8:55 AM, Mike Kienenberger <> wrote:
> My guess would be no, but others may have a different opinion.   Our
> dependencies use commons-logging.
> But the nice thing about the commons-logging api is that you can
> trivially replace the commons-logging jar files with
> jcl-over-slf4j.jar.
> I do this now in one of my projects.
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Juan José Gil <> wrote:
>> Is there any plan to use slf4j instead of commons-logging with cayenne?
>> If you need someone who do the nasty work, I would be glad to contribute a
>> patch :)

View raw message