Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cayenne.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cayenne.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
Subject: Re: Stateless RequestHandler
From: Andrus Adamchik <andrus@objectstyle.org>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAM1yOjbCbWv5P6xA98E_VdiUWtSo5wno0dwa6wFD8gzJbnxNPg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:41:25 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4C3778FA-1A9F-4A49-B9DE-03B1E4366353@objectstyle.org>
References: 
 <CAOUwSGt5ZA3d26_6-+TQaHHBJYGgHzDAKFEZaTTL_C1srh8jfA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAM1yOjbCbWv5P6xA98E_VdiUWtSo5wno0dwa6wFD8gzJbnxNPg@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@cayenne.apache.org


On Dec 7, 2012, at 11:35 PM, Mike Kienenberger <mkienenb@gmail.com> =
wrote:
> My recollection is that the Session version is in there as an example.

Yep. Though many people use that in real apps (maybe those who are using =
CDI or the good old web.xml for services integration), but since there's =
so many ways service integration can be done in Java webapps, we don't =
promote it as *the* way/

> As you've pointed out, it's easy to create Request version.   One
> flavor would create a new Context each request.  Another way would be
> to reuse requests between threads (Really, a "Thread" version).
>=20
> I suspect that this is why we've not added them in the past -- very
> simple, plus it's really two more versions rather than one.

Yep. But I guess this will be a good demonstration that session-scoped =
context is not the only way to do things. So I certainly do not object =
the original proposal, as long as we keep making it clear that this is =
one of the many possible integration scenarios.

Andrus=