cayenne-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net>
Subject Re: Removing Eclipse files from maven modules
Date Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:25:17 GMT
This is my current one:

target/
.metadata
tar.gz
.classpath
.project
.settings/
.DS_Store
*~


Has a few extra things in it (and doesn't have some of yours).

mrg


On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Andrus Adamchik <andrus@objectstyle.org>wrote:

> No objections to .gitignore. For myself I developed a routine setting up
> any new git-svn repo:
>
> git config svn-remote.svn.automkdirs false
> git config svn.rmdir true
> echo ".classpath
> .project
> .settings
> .externalToolBuilders
> .DS_Store
> target
> derby.log" >> .git/info/exclude
>
> Should probably put it on the site.
>
> Andrus
>
> On Dec 16, 2012, at 11:39 PM, Michael Gentry <mgentry@masslight.net>
> wrote:
>
> > Definitely.  That's what I do in my repos.
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 5:58 PM, John Huss <johnthuss@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I think we should add the eclipse files to .gitignore.  They are
> getting in
> >> the way now.  Thoughts?
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Andrus Adamchik <
> andrus@objectstyle.org
> >>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Done (see CAY-1740). If you already have Cayenne projects in Eclipse,
> you
> >>> should first delete them from workspace (or better - switch to a new
> >> clean
> >>> workspace), then update the code from command line, and then "Import >
> >>> Existing Maven Projects".
> >>>
> >>> DO NOT import cayenne-server and cayenne-client - those are confusing
> to
> >>> Eclipse (and not only to Eclipse ;)).
> >>>
> >>> Andrus
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sep 10, 2012, at 7:34 PM, Andrus Adamchik <andrus@objectstyle.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> That was sure one of the reasons to keep the files under version
> >>> control. I don't think we are actually doing it though. There are no
> >>> per-project formatting settings in our Eclipse profiles IIRC. The
> problem
> >>> is also that there are different versions of Eclipse. And then there
> are
> >>> people using IDEA (I have at least 2 in my office alone :)). So this
> >> seems
> >>> like a losing battle. Something IDE-agnostic like checkstyle is
> probably
> >>> more appropriate for this.
> >>>>
> >>>> Andrus
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sep 10, 2012, at 7:23 PM, Aristedes Maniatis <ari@maniatis.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I forget which one, but there is a file which is responsible for
> >>> setting indent preferences, wrapping, etc.  That's quite useful to
> leave
> >> in
> >>> the project so that everyone keeps the same preferences for the
> project.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ari
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 11/09/12 3:54am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> >>>>>> How would everyone feel if we remove .project/.classpath/.settings
> >>> from version control?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We've been going back and force on that in the past, and I usually
> >>> preferred to have them in SVN. However now that m2eclipse plugin is so
> >> much
> >>> better than it was in the past, and also we have many Eclipse versions
> >> with
> >>> incompatible project files, I think we should reconsider that.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Andrus
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> -------------------------->
> >>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
> >>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message