Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cayenne-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cayenne-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 36E31D769 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:12:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89322 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2012 11:12:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cayenne-dev-archive@cayenne.apache.org Received: (qmail 89289 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2012 11:12:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cayenne.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cayenne.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cayenne.apache.org Received: (qmail 89242 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2012 11:12:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:12:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.78.103.231] (HELO vorsha.objectstyle.org) (208.78.103.231) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:11:55 +0000 Received: (qmail 580 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2012 11:11:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.37?) (194.158.197.10) by vorsha.objectstyle.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2012 11:11:34 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Regarding CAY-1714 From: Andrus Adamchik In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 14:11:33 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: dev@cayenne.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) The API was refactored, but the nested contexts feature is of course = still present. Right now you'd create a client nested context using = ClientRuntime: ClientRuntime runtime =3D .. ObjectContext clientContextChild =3D runtime.getContext(clientContext); Andrus On Jul 16, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Eshan Sudharaka wrote: > Hi, > I was trying to reproduce the issue CAY-1714 and it seems that = following > operation is now invalid. (since CayenneContext has mo such method > declaration) >=20 > ObjectContext clientContext =3D = this.clientContext.createChildContext(); >=20 > So is this bug is fixed now ? >=20 > --=20 > *~Thanks & Regards~* > *** > * > Eshan