cayenne-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org>
Subject Re: docbook build failure
Date Tue, 29 May 2012 12:54:35 GMT
Absolutely. 

On May 29, 2012, at 8:52 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:

> I suppose I can maintain two different Maven installations.
> 
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Andrus Adamchik <andrus@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>> IIRC Maven 3 is expected not only for Docbook (?) It's been out there for a long
time and there's no reason for us to support Maven 2 builds.
>> 
>> On May 28, 2012, at 10:14 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
>> 
>>> Yes, since maven will try to recursively build right through the project. If
it is a problem, I can revert it (since it didn't fix the problem on buildbot I was hoping
it would). But someday we should move to maven 3. Is that day now? Any objections to me making
the whole project maven3?
>>> 
>>> Ari
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 29/05/12 11:34am, Michael Gentry wrote:
>>>> Well, that output was from the top level, so even a mvn install right now
currently aborts due to the docbook part.
>>>> 
>>>> mrg
>>>> 
>>>> On May 28, 2012, at 7:34 PM, Aristedes Maniatis <ari@maniatis.org>
wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Well, just the docbook part.  Is that a problem? Can we move to maven
3 for the whole project?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ari
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 29/05/12 9:13am, Michael Gentry wrote:
>>>>>> So you can't build now without Maven 3?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ~/Projects/Cayenne31$ mvn clean install
>>>>>> [INFO] Scanning for projects...
>>>>>> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> [ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
>>>>>> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> [INFO] Unable to build project
>>>>>> '/home/mrg/Projects/Cayenne31/docs/docbook/pom.xml; it requires Maven
>>>>>> version 3
>>>>>> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> mrg
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <ari@maniatis.org>
wrote:
>>>>>>> That was my hunch, but I forced the pom to a minimum of maven
3 and it
>>>>>>> didn't help.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Ari
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 23/05/12 11:03pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I noticed you've asked about Maven version in INFRA-4023
comment. I think
>>>>>>>> this is the most likely cause.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On May 23, 2012, at 3:52 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Does anyone have ideas about this one:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/cayenne-nightly/builds/224/steps/compile_1/logs/stdio
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> It works for me locally, so I'm out of ideas. Why does
>>>>>>>>> ${project.parent.basedir} come out as null? Isn't that
a built-in maven
>>>>>>>>> property? I guess I could replace it with "../" but that
seems less robust
>>>>>>>>> somehow.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Ari
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> -------------------------->
>>>>>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E
3E49 102A
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> -------------------------->
>>>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49
102A
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> -------------------------->
>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> -------------------------->
>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 


Mime
View raw message