cayenne-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org>
Subject Re: 3.1 Beta?
Date Sun, 04 Mar 2012 23:20:37 GMT
Yeah, certainly need to fix it in 3.1. As for the nature of the fix, I am still unsure about
it. Leaning towards fixing it before Beta though. Thanks for reminding.

Andrus

On Mar 4, 2012, at 3:20 PM, Andrew Lindesay wrote:

> Hello Andrus;
> 
> I don't know if it may result in API flux (unlikely) but it would be good to get CAY-1668
(memory leak) resolved in 3.1.
> 
> Regards;
> 
> On 4/03/12 8:01 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>> IMO we are in a good shape now to release a beta. As a reminder of what a Beta means:
>> 
>> 1. Framework API and feature freeze
>> 2. Framework development focuses on bug fixing
>> 3. We can add new features to the Modeler if we have to.
>> 4. Since API is stable, we concentrate on documentation.
>> 
>> I'd probably want to include CAY-1673 and CAY-1681 in beta, but after that I can
start the release. Actually... if CAY-1681 goes to 3.2, this is fine with me too.
>> 
>> Ari, do we have any plan how to publish the docbook docs to the website? It will
become important now.
>> 
>> Andrus
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Andrew Lindesay
> www.silvereye.co.nz
> 


Mime
View raw message