cayenne-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org>
Subject Re: [jira] [Created] (CAY-1639) cayenne-lifecycle: don't call String representation of ObjectId a UUID
Date Thu, 03 Nov 2011 11:43:31 GMT
> Does this need an extra class? (I'm asking because the proposals above look like class
names, but I'm not sure whether that's intentional or accidental.)

No separate class. This is a String. So this is more about the "concept name" used in various
methods ("getUuid") and helper classes "UuidCoder".

Andrus


On Nov 3, 2011, at 1:03 PM, Durchholz, Joachim wrote:

> Just my 2 brainstorming cents:
> 
>> Folks, any suggestions for a short and clear term for what is a String representation
of ObjectId? 
>> 
>> StringId
>> SerializedId
>> StringObjectId
> 
> Does this need an extra class? (I'm asking because the proposals above look like class
names, but I'm not sure whether that's intentional or accidental.)
> If not, I'd simply use String and refer to it as "ObjectId in String form" (or, if the
context makes it clear, just as "Object Id").
> If yes, a look at that class or just its contracts might reveal more semantics that would
allow us to come up with something.
> 
> Regards,
> Jo
> 


Mime
View raw message