cayenne-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org>
Subject Re: Gsoc Project Update
Date Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:27:02 GMT
Sounds good. 

We might still want to change the naming convention for consistency down the road, but good
to hear there's no urgency.

Andrus

On Jun 28, 2011, at 2:16 PM, Eshan Sudharaka wrote:

> Hi ,
>  I am sorry. I found a way to check the content of the XML files (currently
> root element) and if it is cayenne project file then load cayenne icon in
> eclipse. So no need of changing file naming conventions.
> 
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Andrus Adamchik <andrus@objectstyle.org>wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Jun 26, 2011, at 5:45 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>> 
>>> However... nothing prevents us from changing the naming convention again.
>> After all 3.1 is not final yet (not even Beta). We might as well adopt
>> another "double extension":
>>> 
>>> Main project file: xyz.cayenne.xml
>>> DataMap file: xyz.map.xml
>>> 
>>> This will ensure both types of files follow a similar convention, and
>> make them Eclipse-friendly.
>> 
>> Also the beauty of Cayenne 3.1 is that the name of the project file is
>> specified explicitly when the runtime is started, so the file can really be
>> called anything (doesn't even have to have .xml extension). So the focus of
>> this discussion is the tools (CayenneModeler, Eclipse, etc..), not the
>> runtime.
>> 
>> Andrus
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> *~Thanks & Regards~*
> ***
> *
> P.A.Eshan Sudharaka
> Dept of Computer Science and Engineering
> University of Moratuwa
> Sri Lanka
> http://esudharaka.blogspot.com/


Mime
View raw message