Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cayenne-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 15519 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2011 11:08:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Apr 2011 11:08:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 2491 invoked by uid 500); 18 Apr 2011 11:08:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cayenne-dev-archive@cayenne.apache.org Received: (qmail 2467 invoked by uid 500); 18 Apr 2011 11:08:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cayenne.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cayenne.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cayenne.apache.org Received: (qmail 2459 invoked by uid 99); 18 Apr 2011 11:08:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:08:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of grobmeier@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.171] (HELO mail-iw0-f171.google.com) (209.85.214.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:08:13 +0000 Received: by iwn8 with SMTP id 8so5621967iwn.16 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 04:07:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=WMlQf4k32Oe98H1mnBCshUz+28y/zpCSlqJF7d0o1MU=; b=qNtUTfiFCJDEHRF8818UD8yk2xM3b242VsSyi0NgBszPLGhLbGTl5Rf1p1vUB6CDDY fGp1XHUKdNX8mdBinBKsiUFQ/VSJoR/HDL7PcLXabCZubK7KQKg2NXDKX19AKKXPbwGT XOt2pKpF1BrmrHlU3sI2rqIl1ObtuT1QdmoZ8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=rFK4xO+e1hvBNicB8ZCuM9TjtbbrIeNfcAQXpcB23kGdd1g1qZwkwAwVqVjrise4YY IuChxiy/iQ7ou7Y/jQksbDiKnC3c3dFAuljtaSuIi2RzHIUutK3h4E5u2Uv8jJ9Tmhze x/YLZx2ppZ9iFQXTrCnSGrbwuQT6rRZY/W+xM= Received: by 10.42.167.73 with SMTP id r9mr6083423icy.208.1303124872188; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 04:07:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.43.56.6 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 04:07:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6444C967-F6E7-4234-A306-8D1A6E43D50E@objectstyle.org> References: <6444C967-F6E7-4234-A306-8D1A6E43D50E@objectstyle.org> From: Christian Grobmeier Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:07:32 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Maven: Aggregation and unpublished modules To: dev@cayenne.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org >> I can only answer from a user perspective now. I have started to dig a >> little more deep into Cayenne and found the current maven usage very >> confusing. > > In this case your perspective is a not a user perspective, but a Cayenne developer one. And we don't promise zero learning curve in that category. I am not to far with it - i still consider it a user level if I add Cayenne to my App and try to understand what it does with my config. Its problem solving - not developing Cayenne. no zero learning is ok - but not following standards? This needs a good excuse, otherwise its overcomplicating things