Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cayenne-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 69257 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2011 11:01:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Apr 2011 11:01:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 95751 invoked by uid 500); 18 Apr 2011 11:01:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cayenne-dev-archive@cayenne.apache.org Received: (qmail 95734 invoked by uid 500); 18 Apr 2011 11:01:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cayenne.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cayenne.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cayenne.apache.org Received: (qmail 95726 invoked by uid 99); 18 Apr 2011 11:01:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:01:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.78.103.231] (HELO vorsha.objectstyle.org) (208.78.103.231) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:01:04 +0000 Received: (qmail 28609 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2011 11:00:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:::1?) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Apr 2011 11:00:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Maven: Aggregation and unpublished modules From: Andrus Adamchik In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:00:41 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9CD131B2-2CDA-44EF-BD91-4FD53BDE2DA1@objectstyle.org> References: <59E72E45-BF91-43C8-B833-00860046D621@objectstyle.org> To: dev@cayenne.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Yeah, there are various ways around. Although maintaining multiple = branches for the same release of Cayenne seems much more kludgy compared = to what we have now. Andrus On Apr 18, 2011, at 1:37 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >>> Java 9 extensions? Can you give more information - I don't know what = you mean >>=20 >> This is a hypothetical future example. We had those in the past (java = 1.4 compatible builds with 1.5 extensions). >=20 > Thanks :-) >=20 > Guess this could be solved with SVN branching >=20