Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cayenne-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 50433 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2010 14:20:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Nov 2010 14:20:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 48635 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 14:20:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cayenne-dev-archive@cayenne.apache.org Received: (qmail 48522 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 14:20:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cayenne.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cayenne.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cayenne.apache.org Received: (qmail 48514 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2010 14:20:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 14:20:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.213.43] (HELO mail-yw0-f43.google.com) (209.85.213.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 14:20:50 +0000 Received: by ywh1 with SMTP id 1so937455ywh.16 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 07:20:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.65.204 with SMTP id k12mr695640bki.169.1288880429023; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 07:20:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.59.145 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 07:20:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3E859EA6-78FC-4743-8869-CDA96ACAA11C@objectstyle.org> References: <646536A9-5B63-4623-9566-20FA957A9273@objectstyle.org> <3E859EA6-78FC-4743-8869-CDA96ACAA11C@objectstyle.org> From: Michael Gentry Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 10:20:08 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [OT] InnoDB is no longer free? To: dev@cayenne.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I thought at first maybe they just meant the pricing if you want a support contract, but the more I look at that page the more I'm convinced that isn't the intention. mrg On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > Yeah, possibly it is just how they present it to the users (there is a free InnoDB, they just don't want you to know about, hence intentional confusion)... This is why I put question marks in the message - didn't sound quite right... >