Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cayenne-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 47823 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2010 18:09:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Aug 2010 18:09:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 1978 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2010 18:09:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cayenne-dev-archive@cayenne.apache.org Received: (qmail 1943 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2010 18:09:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cayenne.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cayenne.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cayenne.apache.org Received: (qmail 1935 invoked by uid 99); 16 Aug 2010 18:09:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:09:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.78.103.231] (HELO vorsha.objectstyle.org) (208.78.103.231) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:09:17 +0000 Received: (qmail 27056 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2010 18:08:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:::1?) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Aug 2010 18:08:54 -0000 Message-Id: <71155D38-6F08-452C-8B47-6246CC46541C@objectstyle.org> From: Andrus Adamchik To: dev@cayenne.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] release 3.0.1 Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:08:53 +0300 References: <533042FC-AD2D-4C7C-BCF9-F96B075F33B7@objectstyle.org> <09F01896-09E5-4EFB-82D6-DC2BA2D45EEE@objectstyle.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Aug 16, 2010, at 6:32 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote: > Every ASF release must contain a source package, which must be > sufficient for a user to build and test the release provided they have > access to the appropriate platform and tools. The source package must > be cryptographically signed by the Release Manager with a detached > signature; and that package together with its signature must be tested > prior to voting +1 for release. Folks who vote +1 for release may > offer their own cryptographic signature to be concatenated with the > detached signature file (at the Release Manager's discretion) prior to > release. Actually, re-reading the above and it doesn't state a need of a working pom.xml or build.xml, just the source that is matching the binaries. In this respect we don't violate this. We do not provide a buildfile, but a Java developer will be able to build the source regardless (e.g. by writing build.xml himself, or importing sources in Eclipse). Andrus