cayenne-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aristedes Maniatis <...@maniatis.org>
Subject Re: PMC's concensus about what we are voting on [was: [VOTE] 3.0.1 - reloaded]
Date Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:04:56 GMT
If that is the decision of this PMC then I'll be unable to vote +1 without matching the source
back against svn.

Mike, do you agree with the outline of steps required which I posted some days ago? How do
you satisfy yourself that the source is properly licensed? That is, what steps do you take?

Ari


On 27/08/10 3:47 AM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> Legally, PMC members are required to verify that the source code is properly
> licensed.   Most of this generally takes place when the file is committed,
> but some diligence is also required for a release.
>
> A release is completely independent of the svn repository, so there's no
> need to match something against svn.   As a convenience, it's nice to note
> how you could pull the files back out of svn for any particular release, but
> certainly no requirement.
>
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Aristedes Maniatis<ari@maniatis.org>wrote:
>
>> On 26/08/10 5:00 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>
>>> Please evaluate and cast your votes.
>>>
>>
>> Given the previous discussion, I am unclear about what the PMC's consensus
>> is about what we are voting on. I posted an email about this a few days
>> ago... are others in agreement with the general ideas in that?
>>
>> If PMC decides that each voter needs to verify that the source code is
>> properly licensed and matches the svn repository, then I don't know how to
>> do that.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Ari
>>
>> --
>> -------------------------->
>> Aristedes Maniatis
>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>
>

-- 
-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

Mime
View raw message