Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cayenne-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 68404 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2010 09:06:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2010 09:06:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 97784 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2010 09:06:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cayenne-dev-archive@cayenne.apache.org Received: (qmail 97763 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2010 09:06:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cayenne.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cayenne.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cayenne.apache.org Received: (qmail 97753 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2010 09:06:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:06:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.78.103.231] (HELO vorsha.objectstyle.org) (208.78.103.231) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:06:22 +0000 Received: (qmail 3872 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2010 09:06:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:::1?) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Feb 2010 09:06:01 -0000 Message-Id: <59A02079-98E4-4F61-8185-2E7E00243C68@objectstyle.org> From: Andrus Adamchik To: dev@cayenne.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4B7BAE8F.7070205@maniatis.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: wiki pages design Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:06:00 +0200 References: <6C86227C-4602-4E2E-898B-F3BAF8A00EBA@objectstyle.org> <4B772D6B.4080608@maniatis.org> <4B7BAE8F.7070205@maniatis.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) Then we lose accumulated search ranking for the old docs, but I guess if we do it once, it will straighten things over time. Andrus On Feb 17, 2010, at 10:53 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > On 17/02/10 7:48 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: >> On a related note, we need some visual separation of the docs for >> different versions on the site. I've seen more than one case when >> users >> go confused, e.g. when Google returns an old version of the docs >> for a >> given search term. I guess after 3.0 goes final, we can remove >> 1.2/2.0 >> docs from the site completely, and refer people to Cayenne >> downloads for >> the old docs, and then style 3.1 and 3.0 docs differently. >> >> (Also as I mentioned before, multiple versions of the docs reduce our >> google ranking for a given search term, but that's a separate story). > > We could publish robots.txt to keep Google out of everything but the > current docs... > > Ari > > > -- > --------------------------> > Aristedes Maniatis > GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A >