cayenne-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kevin Menard <nirvd...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: CAY-1378, CAY-1009...
Date Sat, 27 Feb 2010 19:37:37 GMT
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Andrus Adamchik <andrus@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> The test suite is not ideal. In fact it barely touches runtime
> relationships, working with bi-directional relationship graphs in most
> cases. We need to improve it, no question.
>
>> I still really don't feel like I mapped my STI relationship incorrectly.
>>  It's the most natural way to do it.
>
> The way you described it in this thread, it is indeed. And the thing is - in
> my tests this type of mapping works without CAY-1009 patch. So I wonder if
> the the actual failing mapping has some details not mentioned here. I'd
> appreciate if you dig up that failing mapping, so that we could inspect it.


I just updated CAY-1009 with the DataMap that was causing me problems.
 I haven't had an opportunity to rebuild that project with the latest
cayenne to see if the problem reappears.  I hope to be able to do that
shortly, but I haven't built that project in over a year.

-- 
Kevin

Mime
View raw message