cayenne-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrey Razumovsky <razumovsky.and...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: CAY-1378, CAY-1009...
Date Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:23:36 GMT
However, I think I could have called addToRelated() programmically without
knowing name of relationship... Not sure though

2010/2/10 Andrey Razumovsky <razumovsky.andrey@gmail.com>

>
>>
>> Now back to 3.0... Could you explain why there is a mismatch in the
>> mapping? I.e. why can't you remap (A -> C ; C -> B) as either (A -> C ;
C ->
>> A) or (B -> C ; C -> B) from the application design perspective?
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>
> In my case I don't have obj relationships A->C or B->C at all because I
> don't need them. Only C->B, others are runtime




-- 
Andrey

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message