cayenne-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrey Razumovsky <razumovsky.and...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: CAY-1378, CAY-1009...
Date Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:20:10 GMT
>
>
>
> Now back to 3.0... Could you explain why there is a mismatch in the
> mapping? I.e. why can't you remap (A -> C ; C -> B) as either (A -> C ; C ->
> A) or (B -> C ; C -> B) from the application design perspective?
>
> Andrus
>

In my case I don't have obj relationships A->C or B->C at all because I
don't need them. Only C->B, others are runtime

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message