Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cayenne-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 4478 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2010 11:20:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jan 2010 11:20:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 51640 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2010 11:20:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cayenne-dev-archive@cayenne.apache.org Received: (qmail 51606 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2010 11:20:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cayenne.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cayenne.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cayenne.apache.org Received: (qmail 51547 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jan 2010 11:20:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 11:20:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.78.103.231] (HELO vorsha.objectstyle.org) (208.78.103.231) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 11:20:10 +0000 Received: (qmail 18411 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2010 11:19:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:::1?) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Jan 2010 11:19:49 -0000 Message-Id: From: Andrus Adamchik To: dev@cayenne.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4C6FCE55-4398-4D3D-996C-F5AD999BF40A@objectstyle.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: RC2 is coming Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 13:19:48 +0200 References: <4C6FCE55-4398-4D3D-996C-F5AD999BF40A@objectstyle.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) Looks like there was a lapse in our release evaluation procedure. I just tried running rat tool and found a bunch of modeler Java files without Apache license headers. Also found a file contributed earlier by third-party that seems to have been taken from a Sun Java Swing tutorial. Can't find it on the Sun Java site anymore, but here is the clone of that tutorial on some random site [1], and I am pretty sure it came from Sun. When I applied that contribution patch, there was no way to tell it is not the original work of the contributor, but when I was doing the review today, I noticed some strange comments in the source, and stumbled on that tutorial. Since Sun has specific license terms for redistribution of their tutorial source [2] and StringTransferHandler is pretty trivial, I just rewrote it, and deleted the original. So now we are clear to go with RC2, but we may need to add the rat plugin to the Maven build going forward. Andrus [1] http://life.csu.edu.au/java-tut/uiswing/misc/example-1dot4/StringTransferHandler.java [2] http://developers.sun.com/license/berkeley_license.html On Jan 16, 2010, at 7:31 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > just checked in the tutorial. I guess we are good to tag the build. > Will do that either tonight or in the next couple of days. > > Andrus >