Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cayenne-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 48972 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2010 11:54:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2010 11:54:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 18289 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2010 11:54:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cayenne-dev-archive@cayenne.apache.org Received: (qmail 18236 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2010 11:54:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cayenne.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cayenne.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cayenne.apache.org Received: (qmail 18226 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2010 11:54:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:54:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.78.103.231] (HELO vorsha.objectstyle.org) (208.78.103.231) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:54:05 +0000 Received: (qmail 15855 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2010 11:53:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:::1?) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Jan 2010 11:53:43 -0000 Message-Id: From: Andrus Adamchik To: dev@cayenne.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4B56EDC3.2040607@maniatis.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Project site links Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:53:42 +0200 References: <30D246AD-ECA9-4B7D-9D93-C5AFD570F45E@objectstyle.org> <4B56EDC3.2040607@maniatis.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jan 20, 2010, at 1:49 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > I didn't want to rearrange the web site too early and show 3.0 > looking like it was complete. For the immediate short term, I'll > switch in all the 3.0 documentation into place on the site. Sounds great. I guess we still want to encourage people to try 3.0, while indicating that it is not complete. So maybe also change "(in development)" label on the left to "(release candidate)"? Andrus