cayenne-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrus Adamchik <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release 3.0RC2
Date Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:39:22 GMT
I agree. We had B1 seriously evaluated by most (all?) active Cayenne  
developers. So we have a base line. The rate of SVN changes on 3.0- 
STABLE is relatively low. All of the changes are bug fixes and  
documentation. So release evaluation can just focus on a "smoke test",  
legal clearance and checking the commits history. That should  
hopefully take less time compared to say putting a new RC in a  
production environment. The good thing is that the end users will help  
us with deeper quality control, but for that we need to churn the RCs  


On Jan 21, 2010, at 4:11 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> On 21/01/10 9:23 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>> It doesn't have to be, although from slow voting on RC2, I guess as a
>> practical matter doing yet another RC is too painful for everyone
>> involved :-/
> Or else we could agree that this is "only" a release candidate. That  
> is, everyone on the PMC doesn't have to verify the entire package in  
> detail. We could treat the voting as a formality the PMC needs to go  
> through and say "we trust that Andrus is doing the right thing and  
> there is nothing going into svn which looks like a problem". That  
> way we could release RCs more often (which would be useful), and  
> still spend much more time reviewing the final 3.0 release package.
> Ari
> -- 
> -------------------------->
> Aristedes Maniatis
> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

View raw message