cayenne-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org>
Subject Re: DI-based configuration works
Date Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:41:22 GMT
It will be an "unpublished" module, and yes, only the Modeler will be  
importing it now. I sort of like to keep things modular as long as it  
doesn't create user confusion (which I think it doesn't in this case).

Andrus

On Dec 8, 2009, at 9:26 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:

> Is creating a separate module needed or would that just add more
> confusion?  Would there be yet another JAR that shows up in the Maven
> repository for people to have to decide what they want?
>
> Seems to me the server side needs to be able to load the model, but
> only the Modeler needs to be able to save.
>
> mrg
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Andrus Adamchik <andrus@objectstyle.org 
> > wrote:
>> I been thinking about this step, and decided against moving  
>> o.a.c.conf to
>> the Modeler. Instead I am going to create a separate new module
>> cayenne-project-unpublished, implementing project saving/loading
>> functionality with the Modeler use in mind. Once this is done, the  
>> Modeler
>> and runtime can be switched to the new stack simultaneously, and  
>> o.a.c.conf
>> and o.a.c.project removed from the runtime jars.
>>
>


Mime
View raw message