cayenne-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org>
Subject Re: CAY-1077
Date Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:24:39 GMT
Cool. If that's what culling is currently about, then I am +1.

So please treat the email that I sent on greying things out as an  
optional nice-to-have feature suggestion for the future releases.

Andrus


On Nov 18, 2008, at 4:13 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:

> You're right, B->A must be to-one, not A->B.
>
> ARTIST.paintings.artist is the same object.
>
> 2008/11/18, Andrus Adamchik <andrus@objectstyle.org>:
>>
>> Hmm... not that I ever mapped a flattened relationship like that  
>> myself,
>> but technically this is totally valid:
>>
>> ObjRelationship: Painting.peerPaintings
>>
>>  mapped as
>>
>> DbRelationship Path: PAINTING.toArtist.paintings
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>>
>> On Nov 18, 2008, at 3:49 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
>>
>> A -> B -> A is culled (B -> A will not be shown) when relationships  
>> are
>>> reverse to each other & A -> B is to-one (e.g. paintings -> Artist
 
>>> ->
>>> paintings)
>>>
>>> 2008/11/18, Andrus Adamchik <andrus@objectstyle.org>:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Nov 18, 2008, at 3:33 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I only was able to play with culling briefly, but it
>>>>
>>>>> looks to be cutting down my choices considerably, which is good.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> BTW, what's this about? Looks like I missed something.
>>>>
>>>> Andrus
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>


Mime
View raw message