Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cayenne-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 43951 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2008 06:32:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Sep 2008 06:32:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 39113 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2008 06:32:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cayenne-dev-archive@cayenne.apache.org Received: (qmail 39098 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2008 06:32:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cayenne.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cayenne.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cayenne.apache.org Received: (qmail 39087 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2008 06:32:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 23:32:48 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.78.103.231] (HELO vorsha.objectstyle.org) (208.78.103.231) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 06:31:48 +0000 Received: (qmail 15321 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2008 06:32:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:::1?) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Sep 2008 06:32:21 -0000 Message-Id: From: Andrus Adamchik To: dev@cayenne.apache.org In-Reply-To: <59F82C2E-C9F0-4481-AFE3-FC3C75926A4B@ish.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Subject: Re: JDBC 4 and build sanity Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 09:32:20 +0300 References: <59F82C2E-C9F0-4481-AFE3-FC3C75926A4B@ish.com.au> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Sep 29, 2008, at 4:41 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > Clearly implementing an interface doesn't cause a problem (since we > do that for dozens of JRE interfaces) but can we write stubs for the > interface itself and bundle that without causing a problem? Note that I am not talking about us bundling JDK interfaces. Just providing instructions to our own developers or anybody else how to sneak these interfaces from the local JDK 1.6 into the local JDK 1.5. Those won't be shipped with Cayenne. Andrus