cayenne-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aristedes Maniatis <...@maniatis.org>
Subject Re: Why the "unpublished" suffix?
Date Sun, 04 Nov 2007 01:53:14 GMT
It might still be easier to have cayenne-core and cayenne-jdk1.[x+1]  
at all times. That avoids us having to move 99% of the code to a new  
project and update all the maven paths, plus all the Confluence docs  
every time a JDK update is required.

Although I guess with the right svn commands the history of all the  
files will be preserved however we move things around, so it  
shouldn't matter too much.

Ari



On 24/10/2007, at 5:39 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

> I think no - somehow I feel there will be "cayenne-jdk1.6- 
> unpublished" in a not so distant future.
>
> Andrus
>
>
> On Oct 24, 2007, at 10:28 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
>
>>
>> On 24/10/2007, at 2:15 AM, Kevin Menard wrote:
>>
>>> It's to differentiate between assemblies that are published as  
>>> JARs and
>>> those that are used simply to build larger assemblies that are  
>>> published as
>>> JARs.
>>
>> Now that 1.4 and 1.5 are being merged, do we want to rename that  
>> project cayenne-core?
>>
>> Ari
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------->
>> Aristedes Maniatis
>> phone +61 2 9660 9700
>> PGP fingerprint 08 57 20 4B 80 69 59 E2  A9 BF 2D 48 C2 20 0C C8
>>
>>
>>
>





-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
phone +61 2 9660 9700
PGP fingerprint 08 57 20 4B 80 69 59 E2  A9 BF 2D 48 C2 20 0C C8



Mime
View raw message