cayenne-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mike Kienenberger" <mkien...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: JIRA changelog & roadmap
Date Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:30:23 GMT
+1

On 2/15/07, Michael Gentry <blacknext@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm pretty lazy right now (as in other things occupying time), but it
> sounds like a good idea -- especially if it can help generate the
> release notes.  So, I'd say +1 especially if the pulldown list doesn't
> get all cluttered with the "archived" versions.
>
> /dev/mrg
>
>
> On 2/14/07, Andrus Adamchik <andrus@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> > Sure, lets wait for another day or two to establish lazy consensus.
> >
> > Andrus
> >
> >
> > On Feb 13, 2007, at 11:23 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> >
> > > Should we wait for others to chime in before making the change?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Kevin
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andrus@objectstyle.org]
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 3:06 PM
> > >> To: dev@cayenne.apache.org
> > >> Subject: Re: JIRA changelog & roadmap
> > >>
> > >> Even better :-)
> > >>
> > >> I just added your id to Cayenne project admins in Jira. Let
> > >> me know if this wasn't enough to edit the versions.
> > >>
> > >> Andrus
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Feb 13, 2007, at 3:00 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I think once you "archive" a version it's no longer
> > >> selectable in any
> > >>> of the issue filings.  For instance, we'd probably archive
> > >> 1.2, 1.2.1,
> > >>> 2.0, and 2.0.1, so they could not be selected as "affects" or "fix
> > >>> version".
> > >>> Bugs would then be logged against 1.2.2 and 2.0.2, with 1.2.3 and
> > >>> 2.0.3
> > >>> available as fix versions.  Versions that are archived still retain
> > >>> their changelogs though.  So, I think that would address
> > >> your concern.
> > >>>
> > >>> I'm not sure how far back that feature goes, though, and if it's
> > >>> available in the version the ASF runs.  A JIRA admin would have to
> > >>> look into that.
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Kevin
> > >>>
> > >>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>> From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andrus@objectstyle.org]
> > >>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 12:56 PM
> > >>>> To: dev@cayenne.apache.org
> > >>>> Subject: Re: JIRA changelog & roadmap
> > >>>>
> > >>>> +1
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The downside is that we'll have a very long list of versions, with
> > >>>> higher probability of making a mistake when picking one.
> > >>>> But the upside (at least I hope) will be that the
> > >> RELEASE-NOTES can
> > >>>> be generated straight from Jira, regardless how many versions a
> > >>>> particular fix affected (currently the RELEASE-NOTES.txt is built
> > >>>> manually).
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Andrus
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
>

Mime
View raw message