cayenne-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Take 2 - Cayenne 2.0.1-incubating release
Date Sat, 23 Sep 2006 21:53:14 GMT
Wait a sec - found a last minute problem - third-party licenses must  
go in the LICENSE file underneath Apache license. Fixing this now...

Andrus


On Sep 23, 2006, at 5:50 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

> [ ] +1  Go ahead with the release
> [ ]  0  Don't know or care
> [ ] -1  Reject the release (explain why)
>
>
> I'd like to start a new vote on the 2.0.1 release. The new  
> snapshots are posted here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.1/
>
> These issues were addressed following comments after the first vote  
> attempt:
>
> * Added license headers to a few source files that were missing them.
> * Moved all third-party dependency notes to the NOTICE file (I  
> copied the structure from the Geronimo project - NOTICE file does  
> not list  third party licenses text, but mentions all included  
> dependencies and their web sites).
> * Confirmed that we are allowed to distribute Eclipse icons (in  
> binary form).
> * Added MD5 signatures for release artifacts.
> * Added PGP signatures for release artifacts.
>
> Please review the new files and cast your vote.
>
> (And here is my +1)
>
> Andrus
>
>
>
> On Sep 18, 2006, at 9:46 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>> Committers and PPMC members, please review and vote on Cayenne  
>> 2.0.1-incubating release.
>>
>> [ ] +1  Go ahead with the release
>> [ ]  0  Don't know or care
>> [ ] -1  Reject the release (explain why)
>>
>>
>>
>> * release files:  http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.1/
>> * release 2.0.1 is a full ASF-compliant equivalent of a non-ASF  
>> Cayenne 1.2.1.
>> * the release has no known IP issues
>> * the release has no (L)GPL or other incompatible license  
>> dependencies
>> * the release is compliant with Apache guidelines (NOTICE,  
>> DISCLAIMER, LICENSE files placement, "incubating" in the naming).
>>
>> Would be great to catch any inconsistencies now, before we send it  
>> out for the Incubator PMC vote.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Andrus
>>
>>
>
>


Mime
View raw message