cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nitan Kainth <nitankai...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Compact storage removal effect
Date Tue, 22 Jan 2019 16:21:01 GMT
hey Chris,

We upgraded form 3.0.4 to 3.11. yes, I did run upgradesstables -a to
migrate sstables.
Here is the table structure:

CREATE TABLE ks.cf1 ( key text, column1 timestamp, value blob, PRIMARY KEY
(key, column1) ) WITH COMPACT STORAGE CREATE TABLE ks.cf2 ( key bigint,
column1 text, value blob, PRIMARY KEY (key, column1) ) WITH COMPACT STORAGE
CREATE TABLE ks.cf3 ( key text, column1 timestamp, value int, PRIMARY KEY
(key, column1) ) WITH COMPACT STORAGE

On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:07 AM Chris Lohfink <clohfink@apple.com.invalid>
wrote:

> What version are you running? Did you include an upgradesstables -a or
> something to rebuild without the compact storage in your migration?
>
> After 3.0 the new format can be more or less the same size as the 2.x
> compact storage tables depending on schema (which can impact things a lot).
>
> Chris
>
> > On Jan 22, 2019, at 9:58 AM, Nitan Kainth <nitankainth@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are testing to migrate off from compact storage. After removing
> compact storage, we were hoping to see an increase in disk usage but
> nothing changed.
> > any feedback, why didn't we see an increase in storage?
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@cassandra.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@cassandra.apache.org
>
>

Mime
View raw message