cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From kurt greaves <k...@instaclustr.com>
Subject Re: Token range redistribution
Date Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:20:46 GMT
That's assuming your data is perfectly consistent, which is unlikely.
Typically that strategy is a bad idea and you should avoid it.

On Thu., 19 Apr. 2018, 07:00 Richard Gray, <richard.gray@smxemail.com>
wrote:

> On 2018-04-18 21:28, kurt greaves wrote:
> > replacing. Simply removing and adding back a new node without replace
> > address will end up with the new node having different tokens, which
> > would mean data loss in the use case you described.
>
> If you have replication factor N > 1, you haven't necessarily lost data
> unless you've swapped out N or more nodes (without using
> replace_address). If you've swapped out fewer than N nodes, you should
> still be able to restore consistency by running a repair.
>
> --
> Richard Gray
>
> _____________________________________________________________________________
>
> This email has been filtered by SMX. For more info visit
> http://smxemail.com
>
> _____________________________________________________________________________
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@cassandra.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@cassandra.apache.org
>
>

Mime
View raw message