Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EF46200C7B for ; Sat, 20 May 2017 12:31:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 7D745160BBC; Sat, 20 May 2017 10:31:52 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D465160BAD for ; Sat, 20 May 2017 12:31:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 26580 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2017 10:31:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 26570 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2017 10:31:50 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 May 2017 10:31:50 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id A208FCCD00 for ; Sat, 20 May 2017 10:31:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.379 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.379 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UMmxIOi0dsFJ for ; Sat, 20 May 2017 10:31:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ua0-f170.google.com (mail-ua0-f170.google.com [209.85.217.170]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 50C9A5F36B for ; Sat, 20 May 2017 10:31:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ua0-f170.google.com with SMTP id e28so38146436uah.0 for ; Sat, 20 May 2017 03:31:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=o8Om8nDuPQNItzZRaoL78wOa/XdVK3Dx2yS1XUshrPI=; b=n3hD3eg/dVCh9cxcOfVPSxhP2n2ZsKevFb05yU40JmVAs/UOh/RwrB2H2MVzhOQdMp G2OTZxpaMO8W9qoBbEeLDHAg8KIj1H5jdLtvQ9Je4t0dJljJF/X/2JZO62R4aWe8KgYP zFs4ygNoJROlNaoptUaOYqDdMDIsL20+aSMXmzRh6JiUbd2R6wgNfjkIQa5D44c/x1ga 8Z6YdEe+VeUTPCwP10RqXzDJdJ11D1Sh5ete93lNnTKjG+RRlLQw2EAAgx8J+ytFlmWJ aL9mNpEEd39c4oOiqXH8EJtiSfrj1uNNoIY3cwa3c0mL/pfjXC7ujmHBIU6MJzJhln/i NuWA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=o8Om8nDuPQNItzZRaoL78wOa/XdVK3Dx2yS1XUshrPI=; b=Gxq9qUjxg+Evq4uxDth6nZCkDJULf91i96aVlpG1Pwtp4Jr8BH79Qw/GX18yCu/DiQ 6v1NjbbQEc+HLrppQ4pAASHu1UNDlxkaYo+jASvqFYMIG1XVnG1AvvnqudyvbDMoe1wO 3zubfJfMwK72PhY44yE3m2ioMN2GaV4B9q4/U4SQAfQPzz1tl7uBeiUANKaxKsj+iud+ cisilpcUNpU6cPTerkcfCJGAzTW+mmmdaVtCIVYue09uLWc0Htn94lmb5wqXvrjIXBGX y3esxdM2Gw199RRtyUlr7+vLBanAi4zcIz+djB6rSKvop18wYlqnAlS6Dri257Jzi3n7 NDSQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDhnt9ebHe7Mxzbspyc8gXInIti2x/6/YN16V9LljA4lNrjaNtG GBgKj/6RCHuk9ib/sPtg3aA32RLQLA== X-Received: by 10.159.35.22 with SMTP id 22mr7200786uae.134.1495276301774; Sat, 20 May 2017 03:31:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.80.23 with HTTP; Sat, 20 May 2017 03:31:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <0D06E0A4-5F79-4FB2-AE6E-D4C044F01752@uber.com> References: <0D06E0A4-5F79-4FB2-AE6E-D4C044F01752@uber.com> From: Stefano Ortolani Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 11:31:21 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is it safe to upgrade 2.2.6 to 3.0.13? To: Varun Gupta Cc: Nicolas Guyomar , Xihui He , user@cassandra.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113e07d8cef7e1054ff22411" archived-at: Sat, 20 May 2017 10:31:52 -0000 --001a113e07d8cef7e1054ff22411 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Varun, can you elaborate a bit more? I have seen a schema change being pushed, but that was just the first restart. After that, everything has been smooth so far (including several schema changes, all of them verified via "describe"). Thanks! Stefano On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 2:10 AM, Varun Gupta wrote: > We upgraded from 2.2.5 to 3.0.11 and it works fine. I will suggest not to > go with 3.013, we are seeing some issues with schema mismatch due to which > we had to rollback to 3.0.11. > > Thanks, > Varun > > On May 19, 2017, at 7:43 AM, Stefano Ortolani wrote: > > Here (https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/cassandra-3.0/NEWS.txt) is > stated that the minimum supported version for the 2.2.X branch is 2.2.2. > > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Nicolas Guyomar < > nicolas.guyomar@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Xihui, >> >> I was looking for this documentation also, but I believe datastax removed >> it, and it is not available yet on the apache website >> >> As far as I remember, intermediate version was needed if C* Version < >> 2.1.7. >> >> You should be safe starting from 2.2.6, but testing the upgrade on a >> dedicated platform is always a good idea. >> >> Nicolas >> >> On 19 May 2017 at 09:02, Xihui He wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> We are planning to upgrade our production cluster to 3.x, but I can't >>> find the upgrade guide anymore. >>> Can I upgrade to 3.0.13 from 2.2.6 directly? Is a interim version >>> necessary? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Xihui >>> >> >> > --001a113e07d8cef7e1054ff22411 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Varun,=C2=A0

can you elaborate a bit more?= I have seen a schema change being pushed, but that was just the first rest= art. After that, everything has been smooth so far (including several schem= a changes, all of them verified via "describe").
=
Thanks!
Stefano

On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 2:10 AM, Varun G= upta <varung@uber.com> wrote:
We upgraded from 2.2.5 to 3.0.11 and it works fine= . I will suggest not to go with 3.013, we are seeing some issues with schem= a mismatch due to which we had to rollback to 3.0.11.

Thanks,
Va= run

On May 19, 2017, at 7:43 AM,= Stefano Ortolani <ostefano@gmail.com> wrote:

Here (https://github.com/apache/<= wbr>cassandra/blob/cassandra-3.0/NEWS.txt) is stated that the mini= mum supported version for the 2.2.X branch is 2.2.2.

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 2:16 PM, N= icolas Guyomar <nicolas.guyomar@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Xihui,

I was looking for this documentation also, but I believe datastax remove= d it, and it is not available yet on the apache website

As far as I remember, intermediate version was needed if =C2=A0C* Ver= sion < 2.1.7.

You should be safe starting from = 2.2.6, but testing the upgrade on a dedicated platform is always a good ide= a.

Nicolas

On 19 May 2017 at 09:02, Xihui = He <xihuihe@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi All,

We are planning to upgrade = our production cluster to 3.x, but I can't find the upgrade guide anymo= re.
Can I upgrade to 3.0.13 from 2.2.6 directly? Is a interim ver= sion necessary?

Thanks,
Xihui



--001a113e07d8cef7e1054ff22411--