Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E8C200C23 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 00:20:32 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 0F76A160B68; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 23:20:32 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 32075160B3E for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 00:20:31 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 26413 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2017 23:20:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 26403 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2017 23:20:29 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 23:20:29 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1C95DC0934 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 23:20:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.498 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.498 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=peernova-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5GXYmcIXOvG5 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 23:20:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f44.google.com (mail-oi0-f44.google.com [209.85.218.44]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id DCBFF5F24B for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 23:20:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f44.google.com with SMTP id w204so74001032oiw.0 for ; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 15:20:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=peernova-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hGK93O7dK1qEnsSBHTOvp13xPVmuAq+Ge+FqSQL4IcI=; b=ngj1CXUlLat0RPPRbtWjC95ThlG8RfgFeB7YRUdfVf44vrOz7+wgb2svHZxvZ3g5kr 1Kufa4OmcJ9WfIq/G0etvj6G6KgOJYzoSuyJCCSKG1EMTsjESoB2QuRsbS0RFlYtogij eWPwyuFvKlhy72401iiFx6mGXsJfgPcU02Ee8vdM5bdP+E97bHPc/KwHSms/DbquaaMc xNHQL29/Yp580CTt0B0TMr2cvrP0c4TS1yqB0w6eVj2Ge9XPFp4lo3Sf9olj3U1yIDG1 353lGQw+9cROsWhWy3OYNKT74+tFY19fHrHfxhLh3y3dCud5V93DveSHLA55sVGPkQoP p1MQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hGK93O7dK1qEnsSBHTOvp13xPVmuAq+Ge+FqSQL4IcI=; b=NeBdyQFczDIXu9xy19NYy2nEirozi9Mo0HobxiKEU3Qffs64gqq0tkxbL97ufR/MI5 wMn1lBrAjfnayBBbd5hXM9Z9DkT/a04uZbQueac1SSVVAX9lgZTtUF+j1mWv1NWab/Jw 2a43tqbaMPBp2dBfU39N39/rOK+ilqysbY3qBhe696kHr5XZsYL0G3js5B+MMJSWxcoW K9A9rOxAMStI71tNzH+4TmoS8DHj7DjuuaPE11ig5jQ4OuRTzruPHfLIPE2QUeU0Y7r3 0erGcV7T5PWbYu2gIppsAF0F3oPLAElBvlxLS0tBTK3MCLs8zoLEcCBHFbYfc9N2l/M6 licg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lVf+Be6G4FVjXl9my9aZns71k8grB8raB0pN3TlgxIyppWMmkJAZiFMotMvWk4/2L+VtmJegHvbeo7B+Nc X-Received: by 10.202.252.216 with SMTP id a207mr8068510oii.98.1486509604375; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 15:20:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.8.79 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 15:20:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <5899be59.d4d9540a.57e2e.b94eSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> From: Kant Kodali Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 15:20:03 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: AW: Why does CockroachDB github website say Cassandra has noAvailability on datacenter failure? To: user@cassandra.apache.org Cc: DuyHai Doan , "dev@cassandra.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d3612ecb1b60547f8fcd5 archived-at: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 23:20:32 -0000 --001a113d3612ecb1b60547f8fcd5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable LOL They took down that image finally!! But I would still keep an eye on what kind of fake benchmarks they might come up with. On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Amit Trivedi wrote: > It indeed is a marketing gimmick. By clubbing Cassandra with likes of > HBase that favors consistency over availability, points under cons sectio= n > are all true, just not true when applied to any one database from that > group. > > Thanks and Regards > > Amit Trivedi > > On Feb 7, 2017, 7:32 AM -0500, j.kesten@enercast.de, wrote: > > Deeper inside there is a diagram: > > > > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cockroachdb/cockroach/ > master/docs/media/sql-nosql-newsql.png > > > > They compare to NoSQL along with Riak, HBase and Cassandra. > > > > Of course you CAN have a Cassandra cluster which is not fully available > with loss of a dc nor consistent. > > > > Marketing =F0=9F=98=8A > > > > Gesendet von meinem Windows 10 Phone > > > > *Von:* DuyHai Doan > *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 7. Februar 2017 11:53 > *An:* dev@cassandra.apache.org > *Cc:* user@cassandra.apache.org > *Betreff:* Re: Why does CockroachDB github website say Cassandra has > noAvailability on datacenter failure? > > > > The link you posted doesn't say anything about Cassandra > > Le 7 f=C3=A9vr. 2017 11:41, "Kant Kodali" a =C3=A9cri= t : > > Why does CockroachDB github website say Cassandra has no Availability on > datacenter failure? > > https://github.com/cockroachdb/cockroach > > > > --001a113d3612ecb1b60547f8fcd5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
LOL They took down that image finally!! But I would still = keep an eye on what kind of fake benchmarks they might come up with.
<= div class=3D"gmail_extra">
On Tue, Feb 7, 201= 7 at 7:11 AM, Amit Trivedi <triamit@gmail.com> wrote:
It indeed is a marketing gimmick. By= clubbing Cassandra with likes of HBase that favors consistency over availa= bility, points under cons section are all true, just not true when applied = to any one database from that group.

Thanks and Regards

Amit Trivedi

On Feb 7, 2017, 7:32 AM -0500, j.kesten@enercast.de, wrote:

Deeper inside there is a diagram:

=C2=A0

ht= tps://raw.githubusercontent.com/cockroachdb/cockroach/master/docs= /media/sql-nosql-newsql.png

=C2=A0

They compare to NoSQL along with Riak, HBase and Cas= sandra.

=C2=A0

Of course you CAN have a Cassandra cluster which is = not fully available with loss of a dc nor consistent.

=C2=A0

Marketing =F0=9F=98=8A

=C2=A0

Gesendet von meinem Windows 10 Phone

=C2=A0

<= b>Von: DuyHai= Doan
Gesendet: Dienstag, 7. Februar 2017 11:53
An: de= v@cassandra.apache.org
Cc: u= ser@cassandra.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Why does CockroachDB github website say Cassandr= a has noAvailability on datacenter failure?

=C2=A0

The link you posted doesn't say anything about Cassandra

Le=C2=A07 f=C3=A9vr. 2017 11:41, "Kant Kodali&q= uot; <kant@peerno= va.com> a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0:

Why does CockroachDB git= hub website say Cassandra has no Availability on
datacenter failure?

http= s://github.com/cockroachdb/cockroach

=C2=A0


--001a113d3612ecb1b60547f8fcd5--