Latest release in 2.2. 2.1 is borderline EOL and from my experience 2.2 is quite stable and has some handy bugfixes that didn't actually make it into 2.1On 30 November 2016 at 10:41, Shalom Sagges <email@example.com> wrote:Hi Everyone,I'm about to upgrade our 2.0.14 version to a newer 2.x version.At first I thought of upgrading to 2.2.8, but I'm not sure how stable it is, as I understand the 2.2 version was supposed to be a sort of beta version for 3.0 feature-wise, whereas 3.0 upgrade will mainly handle the storage modifications (please correct me if I'm wrong).So my question is, if I need a 2.x version (can't upgrade to 3 due to client considerations), which one should I choose, 2.1.x or 2.2.x? (I'm don't require any new features available in 2.2).Thanks!
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this on behalf of the addressee you must not use, copy, disclose or take action based on this message or any information herein.If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply email and delete this message. Thank you.