cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joaquin Alzola <>
Subject RE: Cassandra 2.x Stability
Date Wed, 07 Dec 2016 00:51:54 GMT
On the cassandra web itself.

From: James Rothering []
Sent: 07 December 2016 00:50
Subject: Re: Cassandra 2.x Stability

Is there an official notification of these EOL dates somewhere?

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 4:38 AM, kurt Greaves <<>>
Latest release in 2.2. 2.1 is borderline EOL and from my experience 2.2 is quite stable and
has some handy bugfixes that didn't actually make it into 2.1

On 30 November 2016 at 10:41, Shalom Sagges <<>>
Hi Everyone,

I'm about to upgrade our 2.0.14 version to a newer 2.x version.
At first I thought of upgrading to 2.2.8, but I'm not sure how stable it is, as I understand
the 2.2 version was supposed to be a sort of beta version for 3.0 feature-wise, whereas 3.0
upgrade will mainly handle the storage modifications (please correct me if I'm wrong).

So my question is, if I need a 2.x version (can't upgrade to 3 due to client considerations),
which one should I choose, 2.1.x or 2.2.x? (I'm don't require any new features available in



Shalom Sagges


T: +972-74-700-4035<tel:+972%2074-700-4035>




We Create Meaningful Connections


This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this on behalf of the addressee you
must not use, copy, disclose or take action based on this message or any information herein.
If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply
email and delete this message. Thank you.

This email is confidential and may be subject to privilege. If you are not the intended recipient,
please do not copy or disclose its content but contact the sender immediately upon receipt.
View raw message