cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Rothering <jrother...@codojo.me>
Subject Re: Cassandra 2.x Stability
Date Wed, 07 Dec 2016 00:50:04 GMT
Is there an official notification of these EOL dates somewhere?

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 4:38 AM, kurt Greaves <kurt@instaclustr.com> wrote:

> Latest release in 2.2. 2.1 is borderline EOL and from my experience 2.2 is
> quite stable and has some handy bugfixes that didn't actually make it into
> 2.1
>
> On 30 November 2016 at 10:41, Shalom Sagges <shaloms@liveperson.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I'm about to upgrade our 2.0.14 version to a newer 2.x version.
>> At first I thought of upgrading to 2.2.8, but I'm not sure how stable it
>> is, as I understand the 2.2 version was supposed to be a sort of beta
>> version for 3.0 feature-wise, whereas 3.0 upgrade will mainly handle the
>> storage modifications (please correct me if I'm wrong).
>>
>> So my question is, if I need a 2.x version (can't upgrade to 3 due to
>> client considerations), which one should I choose, 2.1.x or 2.2.x? (I'm
>> don't require any new features available in 2.2).
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Shalom Sagges
>> DBA
>> T: +972-74-700-4035 <+972%2074-700-4035>
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/164748> <http://twitter.com/liveperson>
>> <http://www.facebook.com/LivePersonInc> We Create Meaningful Connections
>>
>> <https://engage.liveperson.com/idc-mobile-first-consumer/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=mkto&utm_campaign=idcsig>
>>
>>
>> This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
>> If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this on behalf of
>> the addressee you must not use, copy, disclose or take action based on this
>> message or any information herein.
>> If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender
>> immediately by reply email and delete this message. Thank you.
>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message