cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ali Akhtar <ali.rac...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Hadoop vs Cassandra
Date Sun, 23 Oct 2016 09:08:42 GMT
I would say it depends on your use case.

If you need a lot of queries that require joins, or complex analytics of
the kind that Cassandra isn't suited for, then HDFS / HBase may be better.

If you can work with the cassandra way of doing things (creating new tables
for each query you'll need to do, duplicating data - doing extra writes for
faster reads) , then Cassandra should work for you. It is easier to setup
and do dev ops with, in my experience.

On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Welly Tambunan <if05041@gmail.com> wrote:

> I mean. HDFS and HBase.
>
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Ali Akhtar <ali.rac200@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> By Hadoop do you mean HDFS?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Welly Tambunan <if05041@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I read the following comparison between hadoop and cassandra. Seems the
>>> conclusion that we use hadoop for data lake ( cold data ) and Cassandra for
>>> hot data (real time data).
>>>
>>> http://www.datastax.com/nosql-databases/nosql-cassandra-and-hadoop
>>>
>>> My question is, can we just use cassandra to rule them all ?
>>>
>>> What we are trying to achieve is to minimize the moving part on our
>>> system.
>>>
>>> Any response would be really appreciated.
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> --
>>> Welly Tambunan
>>> Triplelands
>>>
>>> http://weltam.wordpress.com
>>> http://www.triplelands.com <http://www.triplelands.com/blog/>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Welly Tambunan
> Triplelands
>
> http://weltam.wordpress.com
> http://www.triplelands.com <http://www.triplelands.com/blog/>
>

Mime
View raw message