cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Carlos Rolo <r...@pythian.com>
Subject Re: Most stable version?
Date Mon, 18 Apr 2016 14:45:35 GMT
Sorry to resurrect this now, but I don't consider anything after 3.0.x
stable.

I wrote a blog post about this to be clear:
https://www.pythian.com/blog/cassandra-version-production/

Use it and pick a version based on your needs.

Regards,

Carlos Juzarte Rolo
Cassandra Consultant / Datastax Certified Architect / Cassandra MVP

Pythian - Love your data

rolo@pythian | Twitter: @cjrolo | Linkedin: *linkedin.com/in/carlosjuzarterolo
<http://linkedin.com/in/carlosjuzarterolo>*
Mobile: +351 91 891 81 00 | Tel: +1 613 565 8696 x1649
www.pythian.com

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Jean Tremblay <
jean.tremblay@zen-innovations.com> wrote:

> Thank you Jack.
> Jean
>
> On 14 Apr 2016, at 22:00 , Jack Krupansky <jack.krupansky@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Normally, since 3.5 just came out, it would be wise to see if people
> report any problems over the next few weeks.
>
> But... the new tick-tock release process is designed to assure that these
> odd-numbered releases are only incremental bug fixes from the last
> even-numbered feature release, which was 3.4. So, 3.5 should be reasonably
> stable.
>
> That said, a bug-fix release of 3.0 is probably going to be more stable
> than a bug fix release of a more recent feature release (3.4).
>
> Usually it comes down to whether you need any of the new features or
> improvements in 3.x, or whether you might want to keep your chosen release
> in production for longer than the older 3.0 releases will be in production.
>
> Ultimately, this is a personality test: Are you adventuresome or
> conservative?
>
> To be clear, with the new tick-tock release scheme, 3.5 is designed to be
> a stable release.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Jean Tremblay <
> jean.tremblay@zen-innovations.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Could someone give his opinion on this?
>> What should be considered more stable, Cassandra 3.0.5 or Cassandra 3.5?
>>
>> Thank you
>> Jean
>>
>> > On 12 Apr,2016, at 07:00, Jean Tremblay <
>> jean.tremblay@zen-innovations.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> > Which version of Cassandra should considered most stable in the version
>> 3?
>> > I see two main branch: the branch with the version 3.0.* and the
>> tick-tock one 3.*.*.
>> > So basically my question is: which one is most stable, version 3.0.5 or
>> version 3.3?
>> > I know odd versions in tick-took are bug fix.
>> > Thanks
>> > Jean
>>
>
>
>

-- 


--




Mime
View raw message