cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Satoshi Hikida <sahik...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Most stable version?
Date Fri, 22 Apr 2016 08:46:30 GMT
Hi,

I'm also looking for the most stable version of the Cassandra, too. I read
Carlos's blog post. According to his article, I guess 2.1.x is the most
stable version, is it right? I prefer to use the most stable version rather
than many advanced features. For satisfy my purpose, should I use 2.1.X? or
latest 2.2.x is recommended?

Currently I use 2.2.5, but is the latest 2.1.13 recommended for production
use?

Regards,
Satoshi


On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Carlos Rolo <rolo@pythian.com> wrote:

> Sorry to resurrect this now, but I don't consider anything after 3.0.x
> stable.
>
> I wrote a blog post about this to be clear:
> https://www.pythian.com/blog/cassandra-version-production/
>
> Use it and pick a version based on your needs.
>
> Regards,
>
> Carlos Juzarte Rolo
> Cassandra Consultant / Datastax Certified Architect / Cassandra MVP
>
> Pythian - Love your data
>
> rolo@pythian | Twitter: @cjrolo | Linkedin: *linkedin.com/in/carlosjuzarterolo
> <http://linkedin.com/in/carlosjuzarterolo>*
> Mobile: +351 91 891 81 00 | Tel: +1 613 565 8696 x1649
> www.pythian.com
>
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Jean Tremblay <
> jean.tremblay@zen-innovations.com> wrote:
>
>> Thank you Jack.
>> Jean
>>
>> On 14 Apr 2016, at 22:00 , Jack Krupansky <jack.krupansky@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Normally, since 3.5 just came out, it would be wise to see if people
>> report any problems over the next few weeks.
>>
>> But... the new tick-tock release process is designed to assure that these
>> odd-numbered releases are only incremental bug fixes from the last
>> even-numbered feature release, which was 3.4. So, 3.5 should be reasonably
>> stable.
>>
>> That said, a bug-fix release of 3.0 is probably going to be more stable
>> than a bug fix release of a more recent feature release (3.4).
>>
>> Usually it comes down to whether you need any of the new features or
>> improvements in 3.x, or whether you might want to keep your chosen release
>> in production for longer than the older 3.0 releases will be in production.
>>
>> Ultimately, this is a personality test: Are you adventuresome or
>> conservative?
>>
>> To be clear, with the new tick-tock release scheme, 3.5 is designed to be
>> a stable release.
>>
>> -- Jack Krupansky
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Jean Tremblay <
>> jean.tremblay@zen-innovations.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Could someone give his opinion on this?
>>> What should be considered more stable, Cassandra 3.0.5 or Cassandra 3.5?
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>> Jean
>>>
>>> > On 12 Apr,2016, at 07:00, Jean Tremblay <
>>> jean.tremblay@zen-innovations.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi,
>>> > Which version of Cassandra should considered most stable in the
>>> version 3?
>>> > I see two main branch: the branch with the version 3.0.* and the
>>> tick-tock one 3.*.*.
>>> > So basically my question is: which one is most stable, version 3.0.5
>>> or version 3.3?
>>> > I know odd versions in tick-took are bug fix.
>>> > Thanks
>>> > Jean
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
>
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message