Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D614518246 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 11:50:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40939 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2015 11:50:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 40901 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2015 11:50:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 40891 invoked by uid 99); 9 Oct 2015 11:50:40 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Oct 2015 11:50:40 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id BAD80C0BDA for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 11:50:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.198 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.198 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wq40bF7AkNgk for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 11:50:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f180.google.com (mail-io0-f180.google.com [209.85.223.180]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 0ADED201F9 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 11:50:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iow1 with SMTP id 1so88704102iow.1 for ; Fri, 09 Oct 2015 04:50:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=X4RcLmbHvq07Om4xS2metnojYihJREmNpdvXxPOLYxs=; b=rcD5oXSx1uYaf2DOG6RG1tLOg2ZJEWUFOKYb5ziBXOYzDqwts3AlpadB4RJ1t2Xipk X9kjreUxdK7ERitKGdwGk5guA231Wq87/U52C2/U/8P/cEySfoX2DPPDeV7g6rUUjWmj i0WRd/MbVZKWojn9cRh7qgZkKK1Xkbbit0d9u95DNO7ouQdwtQnAuvofASE8oSHxTNLw Xlo5cwMPISC8OPv3ZNclUGc8gogis4VtG+cyafe5/vQdsmUaAawI6vbFMF+XyazPq0Ga u+cZ1QJG3EvfqeKCOLHHWqlhDdoEVpIWZfGRMebykK7b3Zgjwn2i1i+7DKk3/n9GBIvI KM3g== X-Received: by 10.107.168.39 with SMTP id r39mr16171196ioe.42.1444391437100; Fri, 09 Oct 2015 04:50:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.36.203 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 04:49:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Anishek Agarwal Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 17:19:57 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: compaction with LCS To: "user@cassandra.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114269668671120521aa964b --001a114269668671120521aa964b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Looks like some of the nodes have higher sstables on L0 and compaction is running there, so only few nodes run compaction at a time and the preference is given to lower level nodes for compaction before going to higher levels ? so is compaction cluster aware then ? On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Anishek Agarwal wrote: > hello, > > on doing cfstats for the column family i see > > SSTables in each level: [1, 10, 109/100, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] > > i thought compaction would trigger since the 3rd level tables are move > than expected number, > > but on doing compactionstats its shows "n/a" -- any reason why its not > triggering, should i be worried ? > > we have 5 node cluster running 2.0.15 cassandra version, > > thanks > anishek > --001a114269668671120521aa964b Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Looks like some of the nodes have higher sstables on L0 an= d compaction is running there, so only few nodes run compaction at a time a= nd the preference is given to lower level nodes for compaction before going= to higher levels ? so is compaction cluster aware then ?


On Fri, Oct 9,= 2015 at 5:17 PM, Anishek Agarwal <anishek@gmail.com> wrote:=
hello,

on doing cfstats for the column family i see=C2=A0

<= div>SSTables in each level: [1, 10, 109/100, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]

i thought compaction would trigger since the 3rd level tab= les are move than expected number,=C2=A0

but on do= ing compactionstats its shows "n/a" -- any reason why its not tri= ggering, should i be worried ?

we have 5 node clus= ter running 2.0.15 cassandra version,=C2=A0

thanks=
anishek

--001a114269668671120521aa964b--