Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 13:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <1435350011680.ceafb8f8@Nodemailer>
From: "Sid Tantia" <sid.tantia@baseboxsoftware.com>
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Is it okay to use a small t2.micro instance for OpsCenter and use
 m3.medium instances for the actual Cassandra nodes?
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="----Nodemailer-0.5.0-?=_1-1435350012352"

------Nodemailer-0.5.0-?=_1-1435350012352
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello, I haven=E2=80=99t been able to find any documentation for best =
practices on this=E2=80=A6is it okay to set up opscenter as a smaller node =
than the rest of the cluster.=C2=A0


For instance, on AWS can I have 3 m3.medium nodes for Cassandra and 1 t2.=
micro node for OpsCenter=3F
------Nodemailer-0.5.0-?=_1-1435350012352
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC =22-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN=22 =
=22http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd=22>
<html><body>
<span id=3D=22mailbox-conversation=22><div>Hello, I haven&rsquo;t been able=
 to find any documentation for best practices on this&hellip;is it okay to =
set up opscenter as a smaller node than the rest of the cluster.=
&nbsp;</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>For instance, on AWS can I have 3 m3.medium nodes for Cassandra and 1 =
t2.micro node for OpsCenter=3F<br>
</div></span><div class=3D=22mailbox=5Fsignature=22><br></div>
</body></html>

------Nodemailer-0.5.0-?=_1-1435350012352--