Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F7C817209 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:18:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50004 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2015 16:17:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 49962 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2015 16:17:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 49952 invoked by uid 99); 25 Feb 2015 16:17:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:17:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.169] (HELO mail-ob0-f169.google.com) (209.85.214.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:17:09 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id wp4so4859634obc.0 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 08:16:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=GPHiwNzxAYT9PpcnUBwkVBa2Q4WKFjD1Lpvp11D+TDw=; b=f04rIBUpgSoEaxuB+OwEtwpWf1PiG9MwB4fxe6VoapU6ASc6fIwZiXPNxvZ8b+g6AE Vyv8/ce+wzsZu4IRrS+RXgDBQtfk8d/57jMkp18dSodmJXZA+tkQP9z5ZzDmlZULO9S1 Gh86Yej8pTdkHhieVnn2Ra3fyyGWAtM/sMBHhBvjVP1fse4+yJ9on89KPXCqSdgRdaeE ThJoDP80zROGKWkkIT3cA3BLI62OVyWKiTn7vZAwx5qrOHWgem6Q7L1x+miq/hjfKtvH wUyCISFqn9z8jDSReKQtmOmsGjUjyn5oWwQvj7wzW8eos4YfDdxvcaK4jf6QKv3AjAYF 3LIQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlkcBPDDuEor7sapcjqkBL0S8CG8kwJBJCs+9pTaHtLvW8062YqafFQvvpYO8y4DSmYMk7J MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.107.195 with SMTP id g186mr2540167oic.67.1424880990025; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 08:16:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.200.134 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 08:16:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:16:29 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Possible problem with disk latency From: Nate McCall To: Cassandra Users Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1141bdc6423bf2050febf56c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a1141bdc6423bf2050febf56c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > If You could be so kind and validate above and give me an answer is my > disk are real problems or not? And give me a tip what should I do with > above cluster? Maybe I have misconfiguration? > > > You disks are effectively idle. What consistency level are you using for reads and writes? Actually, 'await' is sort of weirdly high for idle SSDs. Check your interrupt mappings (cat /proc/interrupts) and make sure the interrupts are not being stacked on a single CPU. --001a1141bdc6423bf2050febf56c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=

If You = could be so kind and validate above and give me an answer is my disk are re= al problems or not? And give me a tip what should I do with above cluster? = Maybe I have misconfiguration?



You disks are effectively idle. What consiste= ncy level are you using for reads and writes?=C2=A0

Actually, 'await' is sort of weirdly high for idle SSDs. Check yo= ur interrupt mappings (cat /proc/interrupts) and make sure the interrupts a= re not being stacked on a single CPU.=C2=A0


--001a1141bdc6423bf2050febf56c--