Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jonathan.haddad@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.214.179 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CABzeAR5x+sB3X2C+japQqC9nce=wYCem0ZUhky=VHMREQZ8F_g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEDUwd2wcwSnwWWBwGRuZpO=i3e48C7pWXjktOLaTtN0CW-dUQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jonathan Haddad <jon@jonhaddad.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 01:18:29 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <CACUnPaA7o+-pPp50HyNsJOfKtrL3+_C=yHGr+peG7rsxyxbmJA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: One node taking more resources than others in the ring
To: "user@cassandra.apache.org" <user@cassandra.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01229a16eebf99050fcb4b48

--089e01229a16eebf99050fcb4b48
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

If you're not using prepared statements you won't get any token aware
routing. That's an even better option than round robin since it reduces the
number of nodes involved.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 4:48 PM Robert Coli <rcoli@eventbrite.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Jaydeep Chovatia <
> chovatia.jaydeep@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have created different tables and my test application reads/writes with
>> CL=QUORUM. Under load I found that my one node is taking more
>> resources (double CPU) than the other two. I have also verified that
>> there is no other process causing this problem.
>>
>
> My bold prediction is that you are sending all client connections to this
> node. Don't do that, round-robin them.
>
> =Rob
>
>

--089e01229a16eebf99050fcb4b48
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

If you&#39;re not using prepared statements you won&#39;t get any token awa=
re routing. That&#39;s an even better option than round robin since it redu=
ces the number of nodes involved. <br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Fe=
b 23, 2015 at 4:48 PM Robert Coli &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:rcoli@eventbrite.co=
m">rcoli@eventbrite.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote"=
 style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><d=
iv dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon=
, Feb 23, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Jaydeep Chovatia <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:chovatia.jaydeep@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">chovatia.jaydeep@g=
mail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=
=3D"ltr"><div>I have created different tables and my test application reads=
/writes with CL=3DQUORUM. Under load I found that my one node is taking mor=
e=C2=A0<br></div><div>resources (double CPU) than the other two. I have als=
o verified that there is no other process causing this problem.</div></div>=
</blockquote><div><br></div></div></div></div><div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=
=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div>My bold prediction is that=
 you are sending all client connections to this node. Don&#39;t do that, ro=
und-robin them.</div><div><br></div><div>=3DRob</div><div>=C2=A0</div></div=
></div></div>
</blockquote></div>

--089e01229a16eebf99050fcb4b48--