cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Coli <>
Subject Re: MIssing data in range query
Date Tue, 07 Oct 2014 21:39:25 GMT
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Owen Kim <> wrote:

> I'm aware. I've had the system up since pre-composite columns and haven't
> had the cycles to do a major data and schema migration.
> And that's not "slightly" non-responsive.

"There may be unknown bugs in the code you're using, especially because no
one else uses it" is in fact slightly responsive. While I'm sure it does
grate to be told that one should not be using a feature one cannot choose
to not-use, I consider "don't use them" responsive to every question about
supercolumns since 2010, unless the asker pre-emptively states they know
this fact. I assure you that my meta-response is infinitely more responsive
than the total non-response you were otherwise likely to receive...

... aaaaaaanyway ...

Probably you are just hitting an edge case in the 1.2 era rewrite of
supercolumns which no one else has ever encountered because no one uses
them. For the record, I do not believe either of your hypotheses (key cache
or slice queries having different guarantees) are likely to be implicated.
One of them is trivial to test : create a test CF with the key cache
disabled and try to repro there.

Instead of attempting to debug by yourself, or on the user list (which will
be full of people not-using supercolumns) I suggest filing an JIRA with
reproduction steps, and then mentioning the URL on this thread for future


View raw message