Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6AB6911591 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 21:37:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6710 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2014 21:37:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 6678 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2014 21:37:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 6668 invoked by uid 99); 9 Sep 2014 21:37:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 21:37:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of viy.net@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.177] (HELO mail-lb0-f177.google.com) (209.85.217.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 21:36:43 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f177.google.com with SMTP id l4so6873601lbv.22 for ; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 14:36:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dSkBFCx57Us08DvomUBjldKY85HRvGtpOAGKy01Aw1U=; b=UZjUiCsAGs4HsUcVgtAd4awF3Y9aPoL3EPEa+UNth3qD1QvPdcceZSUr35/jswb/p4 M8c2IRPSsWfiRRXHd6dlk/qW9cZ2mS2rX83TfidKqdAkjwRzYAkx3kZedpfiKd0apCcj Jg8gsswhR0TNq2tnOU6uMFNX5UtoDS6xeYKfz9DKx0iYYQR9xunouT8xu+tt0N2yJ20x fJOxgdsaUJsarVorxOT+khgLsFgeSqDePmXuOZCDcVEDdHWM6NrU95cIarDDlONeYL1N DFu44M4+b6apbhTvX2wqwBHnhXjean1HH42ysovF+moBlGk3RcboaMGyjEWhWxuwcSPB E7vQ== X-Received: by 10.152.45.42 with SMTP id j10mr5382440lam.91.1410298602453; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 14:36:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.218] ([91.214.131.110]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v1sm4655236lag.19.2014.09.09.14.36.41 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Sep 2014 14:36:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <540F72EA.2030604@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 01:36:42 +0400 From: Eugene Voytitsky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: user@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Atomic batch of counters in Cassandra 2.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org As I understand, atomic batch for counters can't work correctly (atomically) prior to 2.1 because of counters implementation. [Link: http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/atomic-batches-in-cassandra-1-2] Cassandra 2.1. reimplements the counters. Will atomic batch of counters work as expected (atomically) in Cassandra 2.1? -- Best regards, Eugene Voytitsky