Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA7E7112EB for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 21:23:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89749 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2014 21:23:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 89708 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2014 21:23:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 89696 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2014 21:23:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 21:23:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of SRS0=l14YJq=4T=basetechnology.com=jack@yourhostingaccount.com designates 65.254.253.60 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.254.253.60] (HELO walmailout07.yourhostingaccount.com) (65.254.253.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 21:22:59 +0000 Received: from mailscan09.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.15.9] helo=walmailscan09.yourhostingaccount.com) by walmailout07.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1XAQTG-0004Vd-5V for user@cassandra.apache.org; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 17:22:38 -0400 Received: from impout01.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.55.1] helo=impout01.yourhostingaccount.com) by walmailscan09.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1XAQTG-00086j-1U for user@cassandra.apache.org; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 17:22:38 -0400 Received: from walauthsmtp09.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.18.9]) by impout01.yourhostingaccount.com with NO UCE id WMNd1o00C0BkWne01MNdsq; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 17:22:37 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=Ir+cgcDg c=1 sm=1 a=UkMH5KcvGpXfM81wB0t8ug==:17 a=aQzbgH187woA:10 a=Ym_f7-FDE0YA:10 a=3jZET7lWBKwA:10 a=jvYhGVW7AAAA:8 a=mV9VRH-2AAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=dlsH-2HFvhMM9yLlJMkA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=5GG0SCeFAAAA:8 a=4AjZRKjYsLGhZPk8XAQA:9 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=tXsnliwV7b4A:10 a=gvo-Q2MDQgsA:10 a=LJZfIIrml57FvTf_:21 a=6Nsp9XPxgQEopsMv/m97rg==:117 X-EN-OrigOutIP: 10.1.18.9 X-EN-IMPSID: WMNd1o00C0BkWne01MNdsq Received: from 207-237-113-28.c3-0.nyr-ubr1.nyr.ny.cable.rcn.com ([207.237.113.28]:55889 helo=JackKrupansky14) by walauthsmtp09.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtpa (Exim) id 1XAQTF-00009X-PE for user@cassandra.apache.org; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 17:22:37 -0400 Message-ID: <5510ED66A90C4BD3A64874ADE26F91FF@JackKrupansky14> From: "Jack Krupansky" To: References: <603801B2842F4AA3B24D92E7D5D9ED2D@JackKrupansky14> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Why is the cassandra documentation such poor quality? Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 17:22:39 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_3C24_01CFA763.DE812440" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3528.331 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3528.331 X-EN-UserInfo: e0a4b55451ed9f27313ebf02e3d4348d:931c98230c6409dcc37fa7e93b490c27 X-EN-AuthUser: jack@basetechnology.com Sender: "Jack Krupansky" X-EN-OrigIP: 207.237.113.28 X-EN-OrigHost: 207-237-113-28.c3-0.nyr-ubr1.nyr.ny.cable.rcn.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_3C24_01CFA763.DE812440 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Blog posts are great for highlighting and focusing the community on new = features, changes, and techniques, but any knowledge content in them = definitely needs to be in the docs as well. -- Jack Krupansky From: Tyler Hobbs=20 Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 12:07 PM To: user@cassandra.apache.org=20 Subject: Re: Why is the cassandra documentation such poor quality? On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Nicholas Okunew = wrote: most of the important stuff being in blog format Which blog posts are you referring to? We could definitely have the = docs team integrate some of the blog post topics into the normal docs = and keep them updated for new C* versions. --=20 Tyler Hobbs DataStax ------=_NextPart_000_3C24_01CFA763.DE812440 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Blog posts are great for highlighting and focusing the community on = new=20 features, changes, and techniques, but any knowledge content in them = definitely=20 needs to be in the docs as well.
 
-- Jack=20 Krupansky
 
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: Why is the cassandra documentation such poor=20 quality?
 
 
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Nicholas = Okunew <naokunew@gmail.com> wrote:
most=20 of the important stuff being in blog format
 
Which blog posts are you referring to?  We = could=20 definitely have the docs team integrate some of the blog post topics = into the=20 normal docs and keep them updated for new C* versions.


--
Tyler=20 Hobbs
DataStax
------=_NextPart_000_3C24_01CFA763.DE812440--