cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hao Cheng <br...@critica.io>
Subject Re: Why is the cassandra documentation such poor quality?
Date Thu, 24 Jul 2014 21:32:20 GMT
I second this, especially since the version association for blog posts is
often vague. This makes looking at historical blog posts quite annoying
because it's difficult to tell if some of the specific advice has changed
since.
On Jul 24, 2014 2:23 PM, "Jack Krupansky" <jack@basetechnology.com> wrote:

>   Blog posts are great for highlighting and focusing the community on new
> features, changes, and techniques, but any knowledge content in them
> definitely needs to be in the docs as well.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
>  *From:* Tyler Hobbs <tyler@datastax.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 24, 2014 12:07 PM
> *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Why is the cassandra documentation such poor quality?
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Nicholas Okunew <naokunew@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> most of the important stuff being in blog format
>
>
> Which blog posts are you referring to?  We could definitely have the docs
> team integrate some of the blog post topics into the normal docs and keep
> them updated for new C* versions.
>
>
> --
> Tyler Hobbs
> DataStax <http://datastax.com/>
>

Mime
View raw message