Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jacob.rhoden@me.com designates
 17.158.232.236 as permitted sender)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Subject: Re: Anyone using Astyanax in production besides Netflix itself?
References: 
 <CAFaNLCZMPdXYMzMpk_d9kf2YmGM_MxC7VJstGejXnHVU-_GCcA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jacob Rhoden <jacob.rhoden@me.com>
In-reply-to: 
 <CAFaNLCZMPdXYMzMpk_d9kf2YmGM_MxC7VJstGejXnHVU-_GCcA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-id: <F0AB65A9-12A2-4B77-AFF9-C3FFAF0A1289@me.com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 08:15:03 +1000
To: "user@cassandra.apache.org" <user@cassandra.apache.org>

Not long ago a vote was organised to get the developers to agree to stop work on the thrift API. New Cassandra features from this point are intended only for CQL. You probably want to make the effort to switch to CQL now rather than later.

______________________________
Sent from iPhone

> On 30 May 2014, at 6:12 am, user 01 <userw93@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> What version of Astyanax(thrift based impl. or beta Java driver one?) are you using ?
> With what cassandra version ?
> 
> Would you still recommend Astyanax at this point when DS Java Driver is out? 
> My intentions are to use Astyanax over thrift based impl for now, & later switch to Astyanax over Java driver(when it gets stable) rather than java driver directly, as I have now got more used to thrift & Astyanax can help me write my queries programatically instead of CQL statements, & take care of preparing queries or sanitizing them, etc. So Would you still recommend Astyanax ?
>