Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 881CD1161A for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:08:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50333 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2014 15:08:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 49735 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2014 15:08:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 49607 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2014 15:08:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:08:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [74.125.82.172] (HELO mail-we0-f172.google.com) (74.125.82.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:08:33 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id t61so11073408wes.31 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 08:08:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=af3AYGAwcl75BxefSsFuNkVeJpbLJD6kr5jbq1U5kkk=; b=H62PeAahGYOlxttq924ngBpyegnOqrQCPTFivPZuJpEvHHlGorIzyL9xGUIFC+Kb7F dRUGWAB9QxOt38b5Jn+E/jDnbsBff5rt8b+qO1mGl/u6M8CTwzmu0SVNYBSwKBr13Irm U4U0U1r/NzfyT/yJh2L17s8TuYAfZVL6akc1coOBsgWGk3wUfWJuuxTvmU8Ib60uzbPU RblcwAWZNJMM/ydoSPkmbyrIlPCqOiB1iDSziSX0SIlO+DvpY5A7NnJhe3IRG9eFBt4H z0xhlitStryI/CuvLfcegdmORiNnTz3u6Uj6qjPp+lGN3HfgQk4LS6q0AkfxR/0pavGb eFPg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnF2buYpSmpuSnJkYT96keftnpLKa2EwKUSg5q+CrA2BGqJ0YHVjGz7ob4U02iUhjZ2H4FT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.174.100 with SMTP id br4mr24904wjc.83.1397660889969; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 08:08:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.71.98 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 08:08:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [200.137.221.206] Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 12:08:09 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Embedded Cassandra Performance From: =?UTF-8?B?U8OhdmlvIFRlbGVz?= To: user@cassandra.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013c60bcdd0a2e04f72a48c1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e013c60bcdd0a2e04f72a48c1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm running a cluster with Cassandra and my app embedded. Regarding performance, it is better to run embedded Cassandra? What are the implications of running an embedded Cassandra ? Tks --=20 Atenciosamente, S=C3=A1vio S. Teles de Oliveira voice: +55 62 9136 6996 http://br.linkedin.com/in/savioteles Mestrando em Ci=C3=AAncias da Computa=C3=A7=C3=A3o - UFG Arquiteto de Software Laboratory for Ubiquitous and Pervasive Applications (LUPA) - UFG --089e013c60bcdd0a2e04f72a48c1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I'm running a cluster with Cassandra and my app embedd= ed.

Regarding performance, it is better to run embedded = Cassandra?

What are the implications of runnin= g an embedded Cassandra ?

Tks

--
Atenciosam= ente,
S=C3=A1vio S. Teles de Oliveira

voice: +55 62 9136 6996http://= br.linkedin.com/in/savioteles

Mestrando em Ci=C3=AAncias da Computa=C3=A7=C3=A3o - UFG
Arquiteto de S= oftware

Laboratory for Ubiquitous and Pervasive Applicat= ions (LUPA) - UFG

--089e013c60bcdd0a2e04f72a48c1--