Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0453010C4F for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 21:03:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52589 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2014 21:03:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 52558 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2014 21:03:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 52550 invoked by uid 99); 3 Feb 2014 21:03:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 21:03:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of olek.stasiak@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.51 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.51] (HELO mail-vb0-f51.google.com) (209.85.212.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 21:03:12 +0000 Received: by mail-vb0-f51.google.com with SMTP id 11so5169891vbe.10 for ; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 13:02:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=KV+YiMsqRAjOztyd7enc79YwVxnZZegUeuaCWvNAJ/Q=; b=fF8P+NVlDaB11U0XhRl+KrCzMydRYvlZfqjW+urmwFEfYuAR7u4L5ZJmRzZwCmHIQS ON59H0i0u7k1cUZZYWiIxb1BadpNQ+1OK1kzlSbaG+wC2u1G1J6PgVPDfudUesNgqTa0 chF1Wfjd8EgCkPFR8aq8m22AELvC6UPjmKwBFOxjWIVYacyeSRIR/crVAiIvoku0jaTm eFEKLiLZoSNmaFHvhsSuowOeSddaFAQYTeiN9uOeq3NDE+sGq5eeqk2n316ZBBgBWe71 Y1kRcdGev1xuEESAqgRzTsg9Wh3yartUk2CGskeavo2zyVnO492ai/x9BddXJx+7FHk7 N0tQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.99.227 with SMTP id et3mr147919vdb.53.1391461371892; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 13:02:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.203.133 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 13:02:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 22:02:51 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Data tombstoned during bulk loading 1.2.10 -> 2.0.3 From: "olek.stasiak@gmail.com" To: Emaillist for cass users Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Yes, I haven't run sstableloader. The data loss apperared somwhere on the line: 1.1.7-> 1.2.10 -> upgradesstable -> 2.0.2 -> normal operations ->2.0.3 normal operations -> now Today I've noticed that oldest files with broken values appear during repair (we do repair once a week on each node). Maybe it's the repair operation, which caused data loss? I've no idea. Currently our cluster is runing 2.0.3 version. We can do some tests on data to give you all info to track the bug. But our most crucial question is: can we recover loss, or should we start to think how to re-gather them? best regards Aleksander ps. I like your link Rob, i'll pin it over my desk ;) In Oracle there were a rule: never deploy RDBMS before release 2 ;) 2014-02-03 Robert Coli : > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 12:51 AM, olek.stasiak@gmail.com > wrote: >> >> We've faced very similar effect after upgrade from 1.1.7 to 2.0 (via >> 1.2.10). Probably after upgradesstable (but it's only a guess, >> because we noticed problem few weeks later), some rows became >> tombstoned. > > > To be clear, you didn't run SSTableloader at all? If so, this is the > hypothetical case where normal streaming operations (replacing a node? what > streaming did you do?) results in data loss... > > Also, CASSANDRA-6527 is a good reminder regarding the following : > > https://engineering.eventbrite.com/what-version-of-cassandra-should-i-run/ > > =Rob