cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Oleg Dulin <oleg.du...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Cassandra and "bug track" type number sequencing.
Date Mon, 16 Dec 2013 12:54:58 GMT
If you want sequential numbers, you can't trust distributed counters 
from Cassandra. However, you could use Redis for this.

Additionally, you can also use a random UUID and only show the customer 
first 6 characters -- it is unique enough...

Oleg

On 2013-12-16 09:33:39 +0000, Jacob Rhoden said:

> Hi Guys,
> 
> As per the subject, is there any way at all to easily associate small 
> numbers in systems where users traditionally associate “bug/request” 
> tickets with short numbers?
> 
> In this use case I imagine the requirements would be as follows:
>>>> 	•	The numbers don’t necessary need to be sequential, just need to be

>>>> short enough for a user to read out loud.
>>>> 	•	The numbers must be unique.
>>>> 	•	It doesn’t need to scale, i.e. a typical “request” system is not

>>>> getting hundreds of requests per second.
> In an ideal world, we could do away with associating “requests” with 
> numbers, but its so ubiquitous I’m not sure you can sell doing away 
> with short number codes.
> 
> I am toying with the idea of a Cassandra table that makes available 
> short “blocks” of numbers that an app server can hold “reservations” 
> on. i.e.
> 
> create table request_id_block(
>     start int,
>     end int,
>     uuid uuid,
>     reserved_by int,
>     reserved_until bigint,
>     primary key(start,end));
> 
> Will having an app server mark a block as reserved (QUOROM) and then 
> reading it back (QUOROM) be enough to for an app server to know it owns 
> that block of numbers?
> 
> Best regards,
> Jacob


-- 
Regards,
Oleg Dulin
http://www.olegdulin.com



Mime
View raw message