Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AFBEACED4 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 01:15:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25623 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2013 01:15:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 25597 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2013 01:15:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 25589 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2013 01:15:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 01:15:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gmanlists@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.68 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.68] (HELO mail-oa0-f68.google.com) (209.85.219.68) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 01:15:00 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f68.google.com with SMTP id i7so4759662oag.3 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 18:14:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=q1sWeobt8RtV7ZPx3n64EiQtlcky8jUcoGJLFXtrbqw=; b=iOHTlxLARnRiFv3GCJqTAspY1P34qk4PoYa3M29LGDozVl+MPGfoAN2veuPb5YVi65 ehqBKNPUBmPP751DYCjANOGxVo+Gq4saK1gQ+AGyhKTOafcQSb/ts9t3Sdd6tRF+GpV/ 33/jqA3XdR05Py4Kblbp9d7hbfUf1OI9sAJWVg1bQeteOMFAP/3HM/d2cFixDxBma3o8 v82Ym4L4kgAgRIzE54VDC5rZQX0xkbM/jEZbVViYWdvHOXGhXT6q+UFi4PNMKmd1iTpP HWvIydcaEOk6Vm010JeNYr8cwIKDXjPrSIX7P80Tf3Ont3togpD8pcrNS/mpPskh/ng4 yjng== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.129.101 with SMTP id nv5mr7074173obb.56.1372036479350; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 18:14:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.65.196 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 18:14:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 11:14:39 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: Cassandra 1.0.9 Performance From: G man To: user@cassandra.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb1ebe4f87f7d04dfdc22a6 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8fb1ebe4f87f7d04dfdc22a6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi All, We are running a 1.0.9 cluster with 3 nodes (RF=3) serving a load of approximately 600GB, and since I am fairly new to Cassandra, I'd like to compare notes with other people running a cluster of similar size (perhaps not in the amount of data, but the number of nodes). Does anyone have CPU/memory/network graphs (e.g. Cacti) over the last 1-2 months they are willing to share of their Cassandra database nodes? Just trying to compare our patterns with others to see if they are "normal". Thanks in advance. G --e89a8fb1ebe4f87f7d04dfdc22a6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi All,

We are running a 1.0.9 cl= uster with 3 nodes (RF=3D3) serving a load of approximately 600GB, and sinc= e I am fairly new to Cassandra, I'd like to compare notes with other pe= ople running a cluster of similar size (perhaps not in the amount of data, = but the number of nodes).

Does anyone have CPU/memory/network graphs = (e.g. Cacti) over the last 1-2 months they are willing to share of their Ca= ssandra database nodes?

Just trying to= compare our patterns with others to see if they are "normal".

Thanks in advance.

<= /div> --e89a8fb1ebe4f87f7d04dfdc22a6--